Human Reproduction Archives
Human Reproduction Archives
Research Article Infertility


Leonardo Monteiro Nesello, Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto

Downloads: 4
Views: 144


Objective: To verify the effect of the physical activity the swimming and of the running, on a moderate form, on the seminal quality. Methods: A cross-sectional study performed with healthy men practicing moderate physical activity. The seminal parameters of 39 men between the ages of 23 and 37 years were evaluated. The participants in this study belonged to three groups: the swimming group (G1), the running group (G2), and the control group (G3). The level of physical activity was evaluated by calculating the metabolic equivalents (METs), using the Compendium of Physical Activities (CPA) to identify the intensities. Seminal parameters of volume, concentration/ml, total concentration, progressive motility, total motility, and sperm morphology were evaluated according to the normal values recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) (2010). The level of significance was p < 0.05. Results: The results did not show statistical differences between groups regarding semen volume, concentration/ml, total concentration, progressive motility and total motility. On the other hand, there is a statistical difference between the groups for sperm morphology. Besides, sperm morphology was below the 4% threshold established by WHO for the swimming and running group. Conclusion: We noticed that there are no differences in the seminal parameters of men who practice different sports modalities at a moderate level, however sperm morphology can be impaired with the practice of moderate physical activity


male infertility; seminal quality; physical activity; swimming; running.


1. Lalinde-Acevedo PC, Mayorga-Torres BJM, Agarwal A, du Plessis SS, Ahmad G, Cadavid ÁP, et al. Physically active men show better semen parameters than their sedentary counterparts. Int J Fertil Steril. 2017;11(3):156-65. PMid:28868837.

2. Jurewicz J, Radwan M, Sobala W, Ligocka D, Radwan P, Bochenek M, et al. Lifestyle and semen quality: role of modifiable risk factors. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014;60(1):43-51. PMid:24074254.

3. Gaskins AJ, Mendiola J, Afeiche M, Jorgensen N, Swan SH, Chavarro JE. Physical activity and television watching in relation to semen quality in young men. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(4):265-70. PMid:23380634.

4. Pärn T, Grau Ruiz R, Kunovac Kallak T, Ruiz JR, Davey E, Hreinsson J, et al. Physical activity, fatness, educational level and snuff consumption as determinants of semen quality: findings of the ActiART study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(1):108-19. PMid:25999214.

5. Kikuchi H, Inoue S, Fukushima N, Takamiya T, Odagiri Y, Ohya Y, et al. Social participation among older adults not engaged in full- or part-time work is associated with more physical activity and less sedentary time. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(11):1921-7. PMid:28230301.

6. Eisenberg ML, Kim S, Chen Z, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, Buck Louis GM. The relationship between male BMI and waist circumference on semen quality: data from the LIFE study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(2):193-200. PMid:24306102.

7. Niederberger C. Re: effects of work and life stress on semen quality. J Urol. 2015;193(2):626-7. PMid:25617298.

8. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

9. Guthold R, Louazani SA, Riley LM, Cowan MJ, Bovet P, Damasceno A, et al. Physical activity in 22 African countries: results from the World Health Organization STEPwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(1):52-60. PMid:21665063.

10. Du Plessis S, Kashou A, Vaamonde D, Agarwal A. Is there a link between exercise and male factor infertility. Open Reprod Sci J. 2011;3(1):105-13.

11. Jóźków P, Rossato M. The impact of intense exercise on semen quality. Am J Men Health. 2017;11(3):654-62. PMid:27645515.

12. Prather H, Hunt D. Issues unique to the female runner. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16(3):691-709. PMid:16005400.

13. Hajizadeh Maleki B, Tartibian B. Moderate aerobic exercise training for improving reproductive function in infertile patients: a randomized controlled trial. Cytokine. 2017;92:55-67. PMid:28092795.

14. Vaamonde D, Da Silva-Grigoletto ME, Fernandez JM, Algar-Santacruz C, García-Manso JM. Findings on sperm alterations and DNA fragmentation, nutritional, hormonal and antioxidant status in an elite triathlete. Case report. Rev Andal Med Deporte. 2014;7(4):143-8.

15. Mínguez-Alarcón L, Chavarro JE, Mendiola J, Gaskins AJ, Torres-Cantero AM. Physical activity is not related to semen quality in young healthy men. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):1103-9. PMid:25064411.

16. Wise LA, Cramer DW, Hornstein MD, Ashby RK, Missmer SA. Physical activity and semen quality among men attending an infertility clinic. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):1025-30. PMid:21122845.

17. Ibañez-Perez J, Santos-Zorrozua B, Lopez-Lopez E, Matorras R, Garcia-Orad A. An update on the implication of physical activity on semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(4):901-21. PMid:30671700.

18. Fernández-Garcia JC. Running for your sperm; benefits of physical exercise on seminal quality. Nutr Hosp. 2017;34(3):503-4. PMid:28627181.

19. Vaamonde D, Garcia-Manso JM, Hackney AC. Impact of physical activity and exercise on male reproductive potential: a new assessment questionnaire. Rev Andal Med Deporte. 2017;10(2):79-93. PMid:29657603.

20. Denham J, O’Brien BJ, Harvey JT, Charchar FJ. Genome-wide sperm DNA methylation changes after 3 months of exercise training in humans. Epigenomics. 2015;7(5):717-31. PMid:25864559.

21. Kipandula W, Lampiao F. Semen profiles of young men involved as bicycle taxi cyclists in Mangochi District, Malawi: A case-control study. Malawi Med J. 2015;27(4):151-3. PMid:26955437.

Submitted date:

Accepted date:

5f3bcf390e8825cd1ae5db49 hra Articles
Links & Downloads

Hum Reprod Arch

Share this page
Page Sections