Human Reproduction Archives
Human Reproduction Archives
Review Article Assisted Production

Pre-implantation genetic study and its importance for fertilization in the prevention of genetic disorders

Tárik Kassem Saidah, Waldermar Naves do Amaral, Patrícia Gonçalves Evangelista, Roberta Silva Soares Ferreira Ghiggi , Mohamed kassem Saidah


Objective: This review is to address the pre-implantation genetic study and its importance for fertilization in the prevention of genetic disorders. Methods: Review bibliographic. Results: Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) is a reproductive option for couples at risk of conceiving a child with a known genetic disorder avoiding having an affected child and consequently discontinuing pregnancy or recurrent miscarriages. Several methods for the biopsy of the embryonic material can be used. Polar corpuscle biopsy is usually performed in countries that do not allow embryonic manipulation. Several methods can be used to perform the genetic study. PCR has been the preferred method of PGD diagnosis for disorders of a single gene. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a method for embryonic chromosome analysis, its utility is limited primarily because only a small number of chromosomes can be identified in each embryo. Final considerations: The technique of Pre‐implantation Genetic Diagnosis is a great ally of in vitro fertilization, offering these couples the chance to form a healthy family, but there is still a little dissemination of the method.


genetic study; pgd; fertiliz.


1. DAHDOUH EM, BALAYLA M, AUDIBERT F, WILSON RD, AUDIBERT F, BROCK JA, et al. Sogc technical update: technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(5):451-63. PMid:26168107.

2. BIAZOTTI MCS, PINTO Jr W, ALBUQUERQUE MCRM, FUJIHARA LS, et al. Diagnóstico genético pré-implantacional na fibrose cística: relato de caso. Einstein. 2015;13(1):110-3. PMid:25993078.

3. SCHOOLCRAFT WB, FRAGOULI E, STEVENS J, MUNNE S, KATZ-JAFFE MG, WELLS D. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):1700-6. PMid:19939370.

4. GOOSSENS V, TRAEGER-SYNODINOS J, COONEN E, RYCKE M, Moutou C, Pehlivan T, et al. Eshire PGD Consortium data collection XI: cycles from January to December 2008 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2009. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):1887-911. PMid:22572107.

5. YAN L, WEI Y, HUANG J, ZHU X, SHI X, XIA X, et al. Advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction. Sci China Life Sci. 2014;57(7):665-71. PMid:24907939.

6. WILTON L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(1):33-41. PMid:15569702.

7. HARPER JC, SENGUPTA SB. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011. Hum Genet. 2012;131(1):175-86. PMid:21748341.

8. HASSOLD T, CHEN J, FUNKHOUSER J, JOOSS T, MANUEL B, MATSUURA J, et al. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet. 1980;44(1):151-78. PMid:7316468.

9. LEEANDA W. A preimplantation genetic diagnosis pioneer takes a look back. Research Use Only. 2015;1(1):1-4.

10. VANNESTE E, VOET T, CAIGNEC CL, AMPE M, Konings P, Melotte C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavagestage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15(5):577-83. PMid:19396175.

11. STEPHENSON MD, AWARTANI KA, ROBINSON WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(1):446-51. PMid:11821293.

12. STERN HJ. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: prenatal testing for embryos finally achieving its potential. J Clin Med. 2014;3(1):280-309. PMid:26237262.

13. MONK MH, HANDYSIDE AH. Sexing of preimplantation embryos by measurement of X-linked gene dosage in a single blastomere. J Reprod Fertil. 1988;82(1):365-8. PMid:3339593.

14. HANDYSIDE AH, LESKO JG, TARIN JJ, WINSTON RM, HUGHES MR. Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(1):905-9. PMid:1381054.

15. IKUMA S, SATO T, SUGIURA-OGASAWARA M, NAGAYOSHI M, Tanaka A, Takeda S, et al. Preimplantation Genetic diagnosis and natural conception: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with translocation. Plos One. 1-12.

16. BRAGA DPAF, BORGES JRE. Técnica de alta complexidade: ICSI. In: Dizik A, Pereira DHM, DHM, Cavagna DHM, Amaral WN, organizadores. Tratado de reprodução humana. 3. ed. São Paulo: Segmento Farma; 2014. xx-xx.

17. STAESSEN C, PLATTEAU P, VAN ASSCHE E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod. 2004;23(1):1476-8.

18. MASTENBROEK S, TWISK M, ECHTEN-ARENDS JV, SIKKEMA-RADDATZ B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):9-17. PMid:17611204.

19. MASTENBROEK S, TWISK M, VEEN VDF, REPPING S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):454-66. PMid:21531751.

20. YANG Z, LIU J, COLLINS GS, SALEM SA, LIU X, LYLE SS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012;5(1):24. PMid:22551456.

21. FORMAN EJ, HONG KH, FERRY KM, TAO X, TAYLOR D, LEVY B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):110-7. PMid:23548942.

22. SCOTT JR RT, UPHAM KM, FORMAN EJ, HONG KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):697-703. PMid:23731996.

23. SCOTT JR RT, UPHAM KM, FORMAN EJ, ZHAO T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):624-30. PMid:23773313.

24. MONTAG M, KÖSTER M, STROWITZKI T, TOTH B. Polar body biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):603-7. PMid:23796365.

25. VERLINSKY Y, CIESLAK J, IVAKHNENKO V, EVSIKOV S, WOLF G, WHITE M, et al. Preimplantation diagnosis of common aneuploidies by the first- and second-polar body FISH analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(5):285-9. PMid:9604761.

26. HARDY K, MARTIN KL, LEESE HJ, WINSTON RM, HANDYSIDE AH. Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(6):708-814. PMid:2254404. humrep.a137173.

27. SCOTT KL, HONG KH, SCOTT JR RT. Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):608-14.

28. HARDY K, HANDYSIDE AH, WINSTON RM. The human blastocyst: Cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development. 1989;107(1):597-604. PMid:2612378.

29. COHEN J, WELLS D, MUNNE S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(87):496-503. PMid:17141767.

30. MCARTHUR SJ, LEIGH D, MARSHALL JT, BOER KA, Jansen RP. Pregnancies and live birthsafter trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(1):1628-36. PMid:16359956.

31. KOKKALI G, VRETTOU C, TRAEGER-SYNODINOS J, JONES GM, CRAM DS, STAVROU D, et al. Bird of a healthy infant following trophectoderm biopsy from blastocytes for PGD of beta-thalassaemia major. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(1):1855-9. PMid:15878929.

32. GOOSSENS V, HARTON G, MOUTOU C, TRAEGER-SYNODINOS J, VAN RIJ M, HARPER JC. Eshre PGD Consortium data collection IX: cycles from January to December 2006 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2007. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(8):1786-810.

33. WELLS D, SHERLOCK JK. Strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single gene disorders by DNA amplification. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(1):1389-401. PMid:9949439.<1389::AID-PD498>3.0.CO;2-6.

34. MUNNE S, ESCUDERO T, COLLS P, XUEZHONG Z, OTER M, GARRISI M, et al. Predictability of preimplantation geneticdiagnosis of aneuploidy and translocations on prospective attempts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9(6):645-51. PMid:15670413.

35. STEPTOE PC, EDWARDS RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;12(2):366. PMid:79723.

36. MISHAEL T, ELDAR-GEVA T, ZELIGSON S, BEERI R, Zeevi DA, Renbaum P et al. Array-Comparative-Genomic-Hybridization (Acgh) based Preimplantation- Genetic-Diagnosis (PGD) for Balanced Translocation Carriers Improves both Diagnostic and Pregnancy Rates Compared to Fluorescent-In-Situ- Hybridization (FISH) and Polymerase-Chain-Reaction (PCR) based PGD. JFIV Reprod Med Genet. 2015;3(2):1-7.

5ad64f210e88255574ead76d hra Articles
Links & Downloads

Hum Reprod Arch

Share this page
Page Sections